What types of outpatient clinics do you work with?

We work best with primary care, internal medicine, and outpatient practices in Florida that are already contracted with commercial payers and need consistent, reliable professional billing. Contact us to discuss your specific specialty.

Do you handle credentialing?

If your providers are already credentialed, we update billing information with payers and you are ready to go. If you need new payer enrollment, that runs on a separate timeline — typically 45 to 90 days depending on the payer.

Outpatient Clinics

Clinic Professional Billing.
Florida specialists.

For outpatient clinics and provider practices billing professional claims, we handle the full revenue cycle — eligibility, coding, submission, and AR follow-up. Best suited for primary care, internal medicine, and outpatient practices in Florida with established payer contracts.

Request Free Audit →See Pricing

>97%

Clean claim rate target

CMS-1500

Professional claim submission

Full follow-up included

Florida payers covered

MedicareFlorida MedicaidCommercial PayersFlorida BlueAetnaUnited Healthcare

"Professional billing for Florida outpatient clinics and provider practices."

What we handle for outpatient clinics billing.

CMS-1500 professional claim submission

Patient eligibility verification

Medical coding (ICD-10, CPT, HCPCS)

Payment posting and ERA reconciliation

AR follow-up and denial management

Monthly KPI reporting

Dedicated account manager

HIPAA-compliant workflows

Multi-provider rosters, NPI taxonomy, and cascading errors

Multi-specialty groups in Florida operate on the assumption that the practice management system has every provider's NPI, taxonomy, and credentialing status correct. That assumption is usually wrong. When a new provider joins a group, payer enrollments often lag the practice management update by 30–90 days. Claims submitted under a not-yet-credentialed provider deny in bulk; claims submitted under the wrong taxonomy (rendering vs billing NPI) deny silently with unspecified reason codes.

We rebuild the provider-payer matrix at onboarding: every active provider × every active payer × every active taxonomy. The matrix is verified against payer rosters monthly, which catches the silent gaps before they cause a denial cascade. For groups adding providers continuously, this verification cycle is the difference between clean revenue and chronic denials.

Facility vs non-facility and the modifier rules that hide revenue

Multi-specialty groups commonly bill both facility (POS 22, 23, 24) and non-facility (POS 11, 49) places of service, often for the same provider on the same day. Fee schedules differ between facility and non-facility rates, sometimes by 20–40%. Billing at the wrong place of service either underpays the claim or overstates the charge and risks a payer audit. We enforce POS-by-provider-by-payer rules so the claim goes out at the right rate the first time.

Specialty-specific modifier rules are where generalist billers lose the most revenue. Modifier 25 for separately identifiable E&M, modifier 59 for distinct procedural service, modifier 51 for multiple procedures, modifier 24 for unrelated E&M during post-op — each has narrow documentation requirements and payer-specific edits. Our rule engine carries modifier requirements per specialty (orthopedics, dermatology, neurology, pain management, primary care) so claims go out correctly modified per Florida payer expectations.